It’s following its programming, the statistical model that it has of its data.” “It has no awareness, no cognition, no idea of itself. This is not your science fiction movie, this is not your favorite Star Trek or Star Wars robot,” he said. Some people are asking if a machine can be considered an inventor, but Burk said asking those questions misses the point. The issue is working its way through the courts.
law doesn’t quite determine who’s responsible for harm put out by a robot, chatbot or unaware, unconscious being. But people will sue over these harms, and current U.S. However, the “who’s responsible?” question remains to be answered, and Burk said the requirement of intent is what’s going to separate these everyday, accidental damage situations from cybercrimes like deepfakes, misinformation and defrauding someone since prosecutors can argue those in court and a jury can decide if someone meant to harm another with AI.Īs we’ve covered, there’s harm AI can cause that humans can’t even foresee yet. It will just be more obvious that our mind always created the world that makes it suffer.” AI is not photography.” Just as photography replaced painting in the reproduction of reality, AI will replace photography,” he wrote in a description. The artist, Boris Eldagsen, won, but declined the first-place award, stating, “They are different entities. The piece looks like an old photograph with two women, one crouching behind the other. One artist highlighted this by submitting an AI-generated piece, called The Electrician, to the World Photography Organization’s Sony World Photography Awards.
ChatGPT and programs like it are able to generate new texts, images and other content – but they’re trained to generate these works by being exposed to large quantities of existing works. Other lawyers say a creative plaintiff’s lawyer could argue AI programmers didn’t deploy proper safeguards to ensure “journalistic” standards.Īnother murky area is copyright law.
#Hal 9000 icons movie#
Tesla has been using a lot of movie and video game references as Easter eggs in its vehicles.He suggested a new approach could be something like disclaiming a product’s liability, but it’s never been done before with technology like this. Several people have been commenting on the resemblance with the turret from the popular Steam video game Portal:
#Hal 9000 icons full#
There are new sentry mode icon and the full screen image. The hacker shared the new image that Tesla is going to be using for Sentry Mode:Īnd to bring it out of the comments, MGM has spoken and HAL9000 is forbidden (those pesky IP rights). There are new sentry mode icon and the full screen image.” “MGM has spoken and HAL9000 is forbidden (those pesky IP rights).
#Hal 9000 icons update#
Now Tesla hacker green, who had access to an upcoming Tesla update in the early access program, reported on Twitter that MGM, who owns the rights to 2001: A Space Odyssey, has issued a copyright claim against Tesla forcing them to stop using the image. The image clearly appears to be inspired by HAL 9000, a fictional AI character in Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. When activated, it displayed a red dot on the Tesla’s large center touchscreen: Sentry Mode uses the Autopilot cameras to “detect potential threats” and it goes through different levels of alarms based on those detected “threats.” The feature was released in early 2019 and it was built on top of “TeslaCam,” a previously released integrated dashcam system with similar capability as Sentry mode, but used when someone is inside the car. Sentry Mode is an integrated surveillance system inside Tesla’s vehicles using the Autopilot cameras around the car. Tesla apparently got in trouble for using imagery representing HAL 9000 from the movie ‘2001: A Space Odyssey’ for Sentry Mode so it is switching to something that now seems inspired by a turret from the video game Portal.
0 kommentar(er)
